Architecture of the Games – User survey (April 2016) – Results

First of all, we want to thank those of you who took the time to complete our User Survey! This does help us to determine what we are doing well and what we need to get better at. As promised, here is an overview of the results of the survey;


Most visitors:

  • Found us via a search engine
  • Read AotG since 2-12 months
  • And visit us 2-3 times a week



About your visit to AotG today

The main reason for visiting was reading the latest news

All respondents indicated that they had found what they were looking for


On the content

The majority of visitors wants more blogposts

What would you like to read about:

  1. Architecture of venues
  2. Look of the Games (font, logos, pictograms)
  3. Bid process (future Olympics)
  4. Venues of past Olympic Games
  5. Latest news
  6. Construction progress
  7. Legacy
  8. Book recommendations
  9. Transportation
  10. Urban planning
  11. Landscape design


The design of the website

How engaging is the design of our website? Score 2/5

Does the website appear easy to navigate? Score 2/5

A few comments on the design of the website

  • Looks dated, like a newspaper
  • It just seems a bit clutterd and overwhelming
  • (Add) a background



How likely are you to recommend this website to someone you know? Score 4/5 (thank you! 🙂 )

Comments, questions or recommendations

  • Please continue!


Our to do list

  • Write more about the topics that interest you the most.
  • Blog more often and more regularly. (but quality over quantity)
  • Improve the design and navigation of the website. We have to agree with you that the website design was bad. We started right away to think about improvements. In recent weeks a number of significant changes have been made. We continue to do so in the coming year.

What do you think of the new website design? Please leave your opinion in the comments.